Opponents of gun restrictions often argue that even seemingly modest restrictions are the first step towards total bans on all guns or all handguns.Bookmark it so you will have an easily available reference next time someone says you're "paranoid."
Some proponents of gun restrictions mock this: No-one is talking about gun bans, they say -- the slippery slope concern is groundless. In the words of Martin Dyckman, associate editor of the St. Petersburg Times (Dec. 12, 1993, at 3D), "no one is seriously proposing to ban or confiscate all guns. You hear that only from the gun lobby itself, which whistles up this bogeyman whenever some reasonable regulation is proposed."
Who is right here? Is it true that no-one is seriously proposing broad gun bans? Is it true that the slippery slope concern is just a bogeyman? Here are a few relevant quotes on this point. (All of them have been verified by me, Eugene Volokh, Professor of Law, UCLA Law School, with help from our excellent law library.)
Because you never know what trivial bit of information may ultimately prove to be vitally important.
Saturday, October 01, 2005
Prof. Volokh's Collection of Evidence Regarding Gun Banners
Via John Lott, here is a website by Eugene Volokh, the point of which is best explained in his own words:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment